|
THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
[Spiral Nature]
Menu
Paganism
Subject: Reflections on OLD GUARD PAGANISM
By: Mike Nichols
'Old Guard Paganism'. The phrase started out as a joke, but then
caught on. This tells us something. It tells us there is a NEED for
such a term. It also implies its own antithesis, 'New Guard Paganism'.
And it indicates that there is some difference between the two -- a
'difference that makes a difference' -- and thus requires
differentiating labels. (It should perhaps be noted that the word
'Paganism' is used in the present context -- however inaccurately --
to refer to modern Neo-Pagan Witchcraft, or Wicca. With grave
misgivings, I have adopted this usage here.)
The first time I heard the phrase 'Old Guard Pagan' (used as a
pejorative, as I remember) was during the organizing of the first
Heartland Pagan Festival. It seems that the festival was being
organized mainly by 'New Guard Pagans' who felt they were not getting
the anticipated support from the 'Old Guard'. Yet, even after such
misunderstandings were cleared up, the phrase remained. Why? And what
is the line of demarcation?
I remember a discussion I had at the time with a long-time High
Priestess and friend, in which we laughingly concluded that an Old
Guard Pagan was any 'pre-Starhawk' Pagan. ( Starhawk's important book,
'The Spiral Dance' was first published in 1979.) Thus, an Old Guard
Pagan is any pre- 1979 Pagan. And yet, seniority alone couldn't BE the
difference -- although it might ACCOUNT for many differences. (It is
interesting to note that Starhawk's book is responsible for a massive
influx of people into feminist traditions of Wicca, and this shift in
focus may likewise account for key differences.)
I suppose it's time for a bit of a disclaimer on my part. By the
preceding definition, I myself am an Old Guard Pagan, having become a
Witch in 1970. Thus, my views may be consequently biased toward the
Old Guard. Still, I don't intend for this essay to degenerate into
shaking my cane at novices and using words like 'whipper-snapper' and
'scalliwag'. On the contrary, I enjoy working with novices and have
taught a beginner's Witchcraft course for the past 18 years. No, my
real goal here is to examine what I believe to be real and profound
differences in attitudes concerning certain key issues between the two
groups. Hopefully, this will lead to greater understanding and
tollerance on the part of both.
In the following passages, I've tried to distill the differences
between Old and New Guard Paganism, presenting them as strict
dichotomies. However, bear in mind the vagaries that must accompany
all such generalizations and the exceptions that will inevitably be
cited.
FEW VS. MANY: Even today, with a substantial Pagan community for
support, a newcomer often feels insecure, frightened, and alone when
rejecting the religious training of childhood in favor of Paganism.
Imagine then, how much more insecure, frightened and alone an Old
Guard Pagan would have felt, with literally no one to support such a
decission. In fact, no one to talk to at all. When I first became a
Witch, I knew of no other Witches anywhere. For all I knew, I was the
first human being in centuries to make such a conscious choice. And
this, I found, was typical of most Old Guard Pagans.
RESISTANCE VS. ACCEPTANCE: Naturally, only those of extraordinary
courage and perception would make such a choice back then. Not only
because they assumed they were choosing a solitary path, but also
because they were sure to encounter active resistance -- if not
outright hostility. Today, of course, Witches have appeared on Phil
Donahue, Oprah Winfrey, Geraldo Rivera, and other national TV and
radio shows, and the general populace is becoming more educated and,
if not totally accepting, at least more tolerant.
SECRECY VS. OPENNESS: But before such positive media PR, most Old
Guard Pagans learned quickly to 'keep themselves to themselves'.
Usually, there was no one to talk with anyway, and when there was, it
was someone trying to dissuade you from your choice. Thus, most Old
Guard Pagans are more inclined to secrecy concerning their involvement
than New Guard Pagans.
INACCESSABLE VS. ACCESSABLE INFORMATION: For Old Guard Pagans,
information was hard won indeed. There were no Starhawks or Margot
Adler's back then -- no one to neatly organize and systemitize the
beliefs of Pagans. There were instead books by Sybil Leek, Paul Huson,
Leo Martello, and Lady Sheba (at best), and books by Hans Holzer and
Louise Huebner (at worst). And there were the historical tomes of
Murray, Thorndike, Robbins, and others, as well as the disorganized
'linking' work of Gardner, Lealand, and a few more. And there was no
one to tell you which book was worthwhile and which wasn't -- so you
read them ALL! Typically, an Old Guard Pagan has read (and owns!) a
small library of books on Paganism. And, back then, if you HADN'T read
the classics (like Murray and Gardner) then you weren't taken very
seriously by other Pagans. By contrast, many New Guard Pagans feel
that reading one or two books (usually Adler and Starhawk) is quite
sufficient. One unfortunate result is that Adler's or Starhawk's
version of Paganism is taken as the 'standard' by the New Guard, which
is far from the case.
SOLITARY VS. COVEN: Old Guard Pagans used to dream of the day they
might meet another real Witche, or maybe even (ecstacy of ecstacies!)
an entire Coven! Meanwhile, there was nothing to do but continue
studying AND PRACTICING alone, as a 'solitary'. This meant that, since
Old Guard Pagans studied and practised the Craft in relative
isolation, they developed strong individual concepts about it, an
inner sense of theology, and the ability to use ritual and magic
effectively alone. By contrast, New Guard Pagans are often introduced
to other PAGANS before being introduced to PaganISM. Their first
experiences are group-oriented ( Would you like to come to a Circle?),
and the group continues to DEFINE Paganism for the novice. Without
going through a solitary phase, most New Guard Pagans never develop a
strong personal sense of what Paganism means. Worse, when asked to
perform magic or rituals on their own, they are brought to a complete
standstill, since all their experience has been with groups.
LONG VS. SHORT PERIOD OF TRAINING: Even for the Old Guard Pagan who
had managed to find a Coven to join, it was only the beginning of an
even longer period of intensive training -- 'a year and a day' was the
standard minimum. During this time, the novice might be apprenticed to
any number of members of the Coven, to learn what they had to teach.
At the end of that time, the candidate MAY or MAY NOT be judged ready
for initiation. By contrast, New Guard Pagans are often introduced to
Paganism and invited to join their first rituals in the same breath
(often at Pagan 'festivals'). From the Old Guard point of view, this
is not only wrong but actually DANGEROUS! A person who is untrained in
handling magical power has no business inside a magic circle -- for
their own sake, and the sake others attending!
JOIN VS. CREATE A COVEN: Naturally, the Old Guard Pagan would much
prefer to join a pre-existing Coven -- the older the better. Only then
could there be centuries-old secrets passed down through oral
tradition for the novice to learn! The New Guard Pagan seems to care
nothing for this. It is enough to gather a small group of people
interested in Paganism, and start your own group. From the Old Guard
perspective, this makes as much sense as a novice mountain-climber
being taken on his first climb by a group of rank beginners as green
as he is!
ONE VS. MANY COVENS: You may also be sure that an Old Guard Pagan is
only going to belong to a single Coven. By contrast, New Guard Pagans
often join as many Covens as will have them, collecting initiations as
though they were stamps. (This is also a mark of New Guard Covens,
because an Old Guard Coven would never consider initiating someone who
is already a member of another Coven.)
INITIATORY VS. NON-INITIATORY: And, of course, initiation was the
ultimate goal of most Old Guard Witches -- the one moment of
transformation that all the training led up to -- the final reward for
years of difficult study, work and devotion -- both alone and in the
group. Most New Guard Pagans don't believe in initiations, since they
claim (and they are often right!) that there is no one in the group
more advanced than themselves.
RESPECT FOR ELDERS VS. NONE: This may come the closest to sounding
like cane- shaking, but it follows logically from the previous
passage. Most Old Guard Pagans would tend to assume that someone who
has been a practising Pagan for more years than they have, has more
knowledge and experience to draw on, and consequently more to teach.
And unless situations prove otherwise, these Elders deserve our
respect. New Guard Pagans, often feeling that Elders must first 'earn'
their respect, do not seek out the wisdom of the older generations of
Witches. The unfortunate result is the loss of much valuable legend
and lore.
TRADITONAL VS. ECLECTIC: Granted, there is no such thing as a 'pure'
uncontaminated tradition of the Craft, stretching back to the dawn of
time. Nor would such a case be necessarily desireable, even if it
could be found. Every tradition has borrowed from outside sources and
is eclectic to some extent. Yet, while Old Guard Pagans often work to
preserve their own traditions, New Guard Pagans are often deliberately
eclectic, with a wonderful disregard of cultural heritage. The
advantage of being eclectic is that it doesn't require much work, in
the way of research. The disadvantage is that one often becomes 'jack
of all trads, master of none'.
SKEPTICAL VS. UNCRITICAL: Perhaps because of the value Old Guard
Pagans place on traditional forms of magic and divination, they are
very often skeptical of new forms. For example, you won't find many
Old Guard Pagans going in for the current fad of quartz crystals. In
fact, Old Guard Pagans will likely point out that there have been no
controlled experiments concerning the psychic property of crystals,
that there is no historical precedent for such beliefs, that the use
of crystals by Native Americans has been overstated and
misrepresented, and that other precious and semi-precious gem stones
are traditionally just as effective. New Guard Pagans, however, are
often not far removed from New Age Pagans, and go in for everything
from crytals, to channeling, to UFO's, without much hint of critical
evaluation.
RELIGIOUS VS. SOCIAL REASON FOR JOINING: This is perhaps the SINGLE
MOST IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE that exists between the two groups, and it
could well account for many other differences. For many Old Guard
Pagans, there COULD be NO SOCIAL REASON for becoming a Pagan, since
Pagans were so few and far between that most of us didn't know ANY
other Pagans anywhere! New Guard Pagans, on the other hand, often
become involved in Paganism for purely social reasons. One has the
feeling that, if there weren't Pagan groups to join, such people would
end up in the SCA, or some other form of surrogate extended family.
Not that such a need isn't valid. But if social reasons are the
primary motivation for becoming a Pagan, it marks a significant break
from the Old Guard, whose motivation was chiefly religious.
Perhaps that is why Old Guard Pagans are often a bit isolationist, and
are quite happy with a fragmented, inular Pagan community. In fact,
Old Guard Pagans tend to look with grave suspicion on the 'calls to
unity' -- to create a homogenous Pagan community -- that one often
hears coming from New Guard Pagans.
RELIGIOUS VS. POLITICAL REASONS FOR JOINING: Similar to the passage
above, this again deals with one's primary motivation for becoming a
Pagan. For Old Guard Pagans, being political was something that grew
out of one's religious ideas. But, just as there is much variance in
Old Guard Paganism, so too there is much variance in Old Guard
politics. From my own friends, I can cite Old Guard Pagans who run the
gamut from Socialist to Libertarian. This same political diversity is
noticably absent in New Guard Paganism, with most New Guard Pagans
sticking to the same party line. Also, there is less tollerance of
Pagans who diverge from that party line. More stress is placed on
being 'politically correct'.
RELIGIOUS VS. FEMINIST REASONS FOR JOINING: Finally, many Old Guard
Pagans have become feminists AS A RESULT OF their Pagan beliefs. By
contrast, many New Guard Pagans are Pagans AS A RESULT OF their
feminist beliefs. Once more, it's a question of which takes precedent.
And although it may seem like the final result would be the same, such
is not the case. Pagans who come to Paganism via feminism are often
separatists, Goddess monotheists, anarchists, distrustful of both
structure and authority, insisting on such ideas as consensus
political forms, rotating High Priestesses (often without High Priests
at all), and other non-traditional Coven structures. (Often, such
groups disdain to use the word 'Coven' and simply refer to their
'Circles'.) The perenial problems that plague such groups (the lack of
focus, the inability to set goals, the endless personality clashes and
power plays, and the fact that nothing ever gets done) come as no
surprise. Much of this would be unthinkable to Old Guard Pagans, who
would no more rotate the position of High Priestess in their Coven
than they would rotate the position of mother in their family. ( The
New Guard attitude toward authority arises, I believe, from a healthy
mistrust of it as it is typically used (abused) in patriarchal
society. This perception is particularly acute among feminists. What
it fails to consider is how authority may be used positively in a
matriarchy.)
NON- VS. PROSELYTIZING: For an Old Guard Pagan, the idea of saying to
someone 'Would you like to join our Coven?' or 'Would you like to
become a Witch?' would have been unthinkable. Proselytizing was one of
the most detested aspects of the religious tradition (usually
Christian) being left behind. Those groups who actively recruit
members were, to the Old Guard, groups to be shunned at all costs.
Witchcraft is not the one, right, and only religion. In fact, it
probably appeals only to a select few. And those few exhibit their
courage and sincerity when they seek out a Coven or a tradition. When
a Coven seeks THEM out instead (Won't you please join our Circle
tonight?), there is no guage of the novice's devotion. Perhaps that is
why the 'drop-out' rate is much higher for New Guard than Old Guard.
(Other mystery traditions, such as the Freemasons, strictly forbid a
member to ask an outsider if they would like to join.)
Lest one conclude that there are only differences between Old and New
Guard Pagans, let me mention a few things they seem to have in common.
First, there is magic -- both in its frequency of use, and what it is
used for. Second, the use of drugs by modern Witches has always been a
minority position, and seems to remain so. Third, the times of
celebration and festival, appointed by the seasons and the phases of
the moon, seem constant (although New Guard Pagans often employ
inapporpriate names for the holidays). So, while there are
differences, there is common ground as well.
If the remarks you overhear made by Old Guard Pagans (and the remarks
made in this essay!) seem slighty petulent, tinged with sibling
rivalry, it is not to be wondered at. The Old Guard Pagan is in the
position of older brother or sister of the family. They often feel,
quite justifyably, that the things which they had to fight Mom and Dad
so HARD for, are now being handed to the younger brother or sister on
a silver platter. They feel that since their freedoms and privileges
were so hard won, they value them more. They often feel that the
younger siblings do not APPRECIATE all the things the older siblings
have done to make such freedoms possible. And, of course, they are
right. Such will always be the way of the world -- the march of
generations. Still, the thing to remember about sibling rivalry is
that, underneath it all, we ARE siblings; we ARE brothers and sisters,
whatever forms may divide us; we ARE all sons and daughters of the
Great Mother.
Document Copyright © 1988, 1998 by Mike Nichols
This document can be re-published only as long as no information is
lost or changed, credit is given to the author, and it is provided or
used without cost to others.
Other uses of this document must be approved in writing by Mike
Nichols.
_______________
Search
Advanced Search
Last modified:
26-07-01
© Copyright 2000-2001 CE Webmaster
[Bar]
|
|
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
|
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
|
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
|
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|