THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi From: catherine yronwodeSubject: Re: XI degree OTO Questions Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:16:03 GMT joseph wrote: > > if the point that XIth degree O.T.O. is of a homosexual nature is > accepted would any one care to comment on the 4th chapter of magick > in theory and practice (the formula of ALHIM and that of ALIM) and > most particularly the footnote at the end of the chapter? Thanks for bringing that up, joseph -- it has spawned its own very interesting thread (The Formula of ALHIM and of ALIM Part 1) in alt.magick -- and it has given me a valuable personal memory flash. As some of you know, because i have posted about this in the past, i first encountered the writings of Aleister Crowley in 1963 or so, when my parents, who owned an antiwaurian bookstore, purchased the library-estate of an elderly women who had died under mysterious circumstances in the hills (wealthy section) of Oakland, California. She had been, to judge by the books in her collection, a Theosophist and/or a friend and near-contemporary of Crowley's, and had probably been born in England or had lived there before World War II. She had beautifully leather-bound copies of every one of Crowley books and magazines, plus letters and other papers, such as a colour flyer and descriptive text for the London art gallery exhibit of Freida Harris' original paintings for the Thoth tarot deck. This woman was said to have been "The Mistress of the Lotus Lodge," but i have been unable to find anything regarding that lodge -- not even information as to which fraternal or magical order sponsored it. In any case, at about 75 years old, we were told by the estate lawyer, she had died of a heart attack while performing a ritual -- her body was found in an invocation circle, surrounded by tarot cards (the original Rider-Waite deck, as it turned out, which i know because i got the cards, as well as her gold-plated silver headdress [made in the UK circa 1915-1920, according to the hallmarks]) and by dozens of gold coins (purchased by a coin dealer, not by my folks). Well, i was already interested in magic at the time my parets bought the library of the "Mistress of the Lotius Lodge," so i read every one of the books from this woman's collection -- and one of the most ODD paragraphs i ever read was the one quoted in the current thread: We have thus a tetragrammaton which contains no feminine component. The initial force is here the holy spirit and its vehicle or weapon the "sword and balances." Justice is then done upon the mercurial "Virgin," with the result that the man is "hanged" or extended, and is slain in this manner. Such an operation makes creation impossible [snip]...The great merits of this formula are that it avoids contact with the inferior planes, that it is self suficient, that it involves no responsibilites, and that it leaves its masters not only stronger in themselves, but wholly free to fulfil their essential natures. Its abuse is an abomination. I was into John William Lloyd's book on karezza sex-mysticism at the time, and to find such an antithetical -- such an anti-hetrosexual -- viewpoint in Crowley's works surprised me. I knew several homosexual men (friends and co-workers of my mother's from the UC library system) -- but i did not fully comprehend then, being only 16 years old, the degree of misogyny that might suffuse the writings of an ostensibly heterosexual (i mean, he was married! he had had kids!) so-called "sex-magician." And the it didn't just seem to be about the joys of gay sex -- it seemed to be about busting "virgin" cherries! I must have read that paragraph ten or twelve times over during the course of a week, trying to understand it without letting it ruffle me. I wondered what the Mistress of the Lotus Lodge had thought when she had read that stuff about "inferior planes." Did she just laugh it off -- or did she, like me, begin to doubt the universal basis of a system of magic so evidently motivated by personal sexual concerns? And what about Lloyd and karezza? After all, neither he nor his mentor Alice Bunker Stockham had the time of day for homosexual sex-mysticism. Were THEY as universal as they claimed to be -- or merely the statistical-majority voice, self-congratulatory and smug? And why the insistance on RANKING? Why did Stockham and Lloyd place heterosexual union on such a distinguished plane and Crowley exalt homosexual cherry-busting sex as superior? Wasn't sex-magic itself an unusual enough path when contrasted to the dominant social paradigm that these long-dead teachers should have considered each other comrades-in-arms, no matter what their gender preference differences? Such were my thoughts in 1963 as a sexually active but socially and psychologically naive teenager. I went on to study plenty more magic, but after that exposure to Crowley's dark underside, i always kept his system at a distance -- because as a woman, i found that reading paragraphs like that evoked in me feelings similar to those i got as a Jew when i read Aryan supremacy propaganda of the 1930s. And now, almost 40 years later, here it is again -- the very paragraph -- out of all of Crowley's works -- that so startled me when i was young. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I need to be shaken up every few decades, lest i become complacent. cat yronwode Hoodoo in Theory and Practice -- http://www.luckymojo.com/hoodoo.html No personal e-mail, please; just catch me in usenet; i read it daily. Lucky Mojo Curio Co. http://www.luckymojo.com/luckymojocatalogue.html Send e-mail with your street address to catalogue@luckymojo.com and receive our free 32 page catalogue of hoodoo supplies and amulets Copyright (c) 2001 catherine yronwode. All rights reserved. Path: typhoon.sonic.net!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3B4FDE1E.158@luckymojo.com> From: catherine yronwode Organization: Lucky Mojo Curio Co. X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01-C-MACOS8 (Macintosh; I; PPC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.magick,alt.magick.chaos,alt.magick.goetia,alt.magick.serious,alt.magick.tantra,alt.magick.tyagi Subject: Re: XI degree OTO Questions References: <24Q17.21$Iu2.5166@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <3B491E45.2AA1@luckymojo.com> <9icige$qci$1@wildfire.prairienet.org> <3B4A088D.568F@luckymojo.com> <3B4EC5E6.75AA@luckymojo.com> <3B4EC7BF.6A11@luckymojo.com> <9inj1o$o9$6@bob.news.rcn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 78 Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 05:44:25 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.204.136.69 X-Complaints-To: abuse@sonic.net X-Trace: typhoon.sonic.net 995089465 209.204.136.69 (Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:44:25 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:44:25 PDT Xref: typhoon.sonic.net alt.magick:252765 alt.magick.chaos:36368 alt.magick.goetia:889 alt.magick.serious:18235 alt.magick.tantra:18663 alt.magick.tyagi:27572 . wrote: > > In alt.magick.serious catherine yronwode wrote: > > catherine yronwode wrote: > >> > >> Josh Geller wrote: > >> > > >> > In article <3B4A088D.568F@luckymojo.com>, > >> > catherine yronwode wrote: > >> > > >> > > ... arguments that the ritual's value is based on the > >> > > "transgressive" nature of homosexuality are going to be met with > >> > > amused skepticism by me, as i cannot imagine that an openly and > >> > > avowedly bisexual man such as Aleister Crowley would have found > >> > > a homosexual ritual "transgressive." > >> > > >> > Can you imagine that he might have found bottoming to someone that > >> > he had only and always topped "transgressive"? > >> > >> (A) It has been stated in alt.magick as "fact" several times that > >> Crowley was always a bottom when having sex with men. Is this not > >> the case? Does anyone actually know? > >> > >> (B) Talk of "bottoming" might lead someone to thing that anal > >> penetration is involved in the XI degree ritual, but some who have > >> posted here recently on the topic have spoken of the rite only in > >> terms of fellatio. Which is it -- fellatio or anal sex -- or is it > >> both? > > > Following up to my own post with a third question: > > > (C) Statements have been made in alt.magick at various times that women > > cannot participate in this rite -- which might make sense if it involved > > anal sex > > It doesnt. > > > (they have too small a copulatory organ for penetration), but > > would NOT necessarily make sense if oral sex were the focus of the > > ritual, for many women emit liquid when having an orgasm, and this > > so-called "fmeale ejaculate" (no matter what one thinks it is, in > > biological terms) could readily fill the waiting mouth of the aspirant. > > So... why no women in the XI degree? > > For many reasons. One of the more mundane ones is that women's > orgasms contain physiologically quite different ejaculates. Ever > eat a cake of light? > > Same idea. Menstrual blood is not an "ejaculate." NOTE: For the record: i am not a member of any version of the OTO or any OTO-like magical order. What follows is based upon e-mail and usenet conversations. During my research into this subject of the abandonment of the XI degree rite by the (c)OTO, i have so far been given TRHEE entirely different and mutually contradictory descriptions of the major sexual activity of the ritual itself. They are: * oral sex (by whom upon whom -- that is, which part was played by the candidate and which by the initiator -- was unstated.) * anal sex (again, by whom upon whom was unstated.) * anal sex performed by the candidate upon the initiator, followed by the candidate sucking his own semen out of the initiator's asshole and swallowing it. Now, i'm not squeamish, but it does seem to me that eating baked menstrual blood (as in Original Recipe Cakes O' Light) or burned-to-ashes-certified-HIV-feee-and-then-baked menstrual blood (as in the new, improved (c)OTO brand Cakes O' Light Lite) is hardly the "same idea" as sucking your very own hot, fresh semen mingled with hot, fresh feces right out of your very own initiating lodge-master's possibly pin-worm-and-hepatitis-infested asshole. cat yronwode The Esoteric Archive --------- http://www.luckymojo.com/esoteric.html
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|