THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: FiatLVX Elist (For Magical Christians) From: Nocifer (tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com) Subject: Western Ethical Guides, Magical and Religious Date: Kali Yuga 49941027 Intro Important words to consider within my vocabulary: 'moral'; 'ethic'. When I say 'moral' or 'morality' or 'moralism' I intend to mean an association with social judgement and behavior-prescription-schemes. When I say 'ethic' or 'ethics' or 'ethical' I intend to mean an association with personal feelings and/or personal systems of self-restraint. Thus 'amoral' to me merely indicates withdrawing from judgement on another person's affairs, while 'unethical' indicates to me that a person has no sense of what is right for them. I think it important to consider that some (like myself) don't engage morality and may not construct a system of ethics, following our intuition and the feelings of our heart. Meat (:>) Comments in reaction to Lainie's post follow. She referred to the following phrases, popular within the occult and religious communities. 1. 'Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.' is a quote from _The Book of the Law_, a text claimed to have been received by Aleister Crowley in April of 1904. Out of context this phrase has been used by all manner of individuals for a variety of reasons. Some see it as an indicator of a new system of ethics of which they are proponents, some use it to identify themselves within a social movement given its initiative by Crowley, and some intend to duplicate Crowley's own usage of these words as what he called 'Thelemic Greetings' (that is, a magical commitment of energy and dedication expressed within social circumstances; possibly equal to self- and social-programming). As an indicator of a system of ethics (or lack thereof), there is no absolute and pre-defined meaning for the phrase, even when taken in context. Crowley himself, when providing an overview and reflection of the phrase, claimed that all meanings are true if but the reader be illuminated. I think it imperative to note that within the Thelemic community itself there is a quite healthy debate over the meaning of 'Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.', along with very many other similar and related phrases. To illustrate the range of possibility here, some consider that the word 'thou' indicates the divine and that 'what thou wilt' is equivalent to 'the will of God'. Thus if one were to take 'do what thou wilt' as a dictum within these meanings, one would hear 'do the will of God'. Of course the other end of the spectrum, and perhaps that which is most popular among the *individuals* aligning themselves with these words, is that 'do what thou wilt' is very literal and simply implies that what is spoken of here is the ethic of doing whatever one wishes to do. The more perspicacious among us will of course point out that it is somewhat important not to overlook the balance of the phrase ('shall...'). In any case, rest assured that, as with most religious and philosophical speculation and doctrine, there is no widespread agreement as to what constitutes the meaning of this phrase as a foundation of ethics. It should also be noted, however, that (perhaps expectedly) organizations which promote themselves as 'Thelemic' take a rather more conservative perspective on the meaning of that phrase when they offer any interpre- tation at all. Personally, I understand that phrase as an observation of Natural Law, in that we shall always do what we will no matter the consequences, and as we accept this as the context of our actions so is our life made more peaceful. >From there of course we may wish to set about devising all sorts of moralistic and ethical systems to guide and constrain us to 'proper behavior'. I don't choose to participate in these last, of course. :> 2. 'An it harm none, do what thou wilt' (and its variants) is often referred to within the Neopagan community as 'the Wiccan Rede', and it is quite important that it has this designated title. While the more conservative will conveniently forget and the novices will perhaps be unaware, a 'rede' is merely a guideline, a recommendation. It does not participate in moralism in the slightest, and those who use it in this way can be said to be interpreting the rede as a law where their predecessors did no such thing. There is some controversy about the meaning of 'harm' within the Wiccan community and the Neopagan community at large. Those unaccustomed to philosophical speculation on the meaning of the Rede are quick to include all manner of damage to all of life, therefore making the guideline use- less except for suicidal ascetics (since we must kill to survive). Others are more conservative and maintain that 'harm' need only mean unnecessary suffering, bringing into question what actions are 'necessary' and when an animal or plant 'suffers' prior to our consumption. Needless to say, there are a few Wiccans who maintain that in order to abide this rede one must become vegetarian (if they have any ecological background), though I'm not aware that such is a trend among either Neopagans or Wiccans. Seldom is the word 'thou' used as a pointer toward 'the divine' unless it be 'the Goddess', since many Wiccans are formerly Christian with a dislike for anything resembling their upbringing, and when they accept 'God' at all, most are likely to identify this with the agrarian Lord of the Animals and Sun King and reject the transcendant divine altogether. Thus 'thou' is usually interpreted as implying the individual Wiccan. Personally I see the Wiccan Rede as one of the most useful of ethical guides, and I understand 'harm' to be intentional action or inaction which violates or coerces another being outside the parameters of the necessities of self- sustenance. I have difficulties with the way humans treat other living beings, as I've mentioned before on this list, and I think that that issue is representative of the controversy within the Wiccan and perhaps Neopagan community over what actions need be taken in order to completely follow the Wiccan Rede. 3. 'That which you would have done unto you, do also unto your neighbor.' or one of the many variants on this phrase (the Golden Rule) is quite common amongst the doctrines of the world religions. It is quite often taken as a moral and ethical rule, and for this reason I think it differs quite markedly in character from the two previous phrases. My own impression is that it is only of limited use, for our tastes from culture to culture and even home to home may not make this a worthwhile rule. Example: I am depressed and want someone to kill me. By the Golden Rule I ought go out and kill. Another: I take great pleasure in being flogged with a cat-o-nine-tails (whip). By the Golden Rule I should go about flogging people. Obviously these are extreme exceptions but they do point out a problem with it as the basis for a system of ethics. 4.. I have often thought that these and the teachings of Jesus Christ were the basis for the Christian ethical system, and that this was true *regardless of context*. That is, it does not matter whether one is engaging politics or magick, these moral proscriptions and prescriptions are sufficient to guide one along the Righteous Path. My own preference is to interpret these as I'm able (which I gather is somewhat encouraged by Jews at least, regarding _Torah_), and to place what bits of wisdom I may have received directly from God BEFORE these teachings, so I have little use for systems of morality or ethics at all. I therefore see these as very important social rules which steer the behavior of those who do not yet have a deep relationship with Christ, and while I tend to follow them within my daily activity (as I understand them), I do not always think that they apply to me. I'd love to hear comment on any of the above and would gladly engage discussion on same (preferrably within the list and maintaining the connection to Christian magick). Thanks. ========================================== EOF
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|