![]() |
THE |
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.magick,alt.thelema,alt.magick.order,talk.religion.misc,talk.religion.newage From: nagasiva@luckymojo.com (nigris (333)) Subject: Thelema and Cult (2) Date: 23 Jul 1999 22:21:01 -0700 49990301 IIIom E6 Rodney Orpheus re why Kenneth Anger and his works are 'Thelemic': #># He's says he's a Thelemite. nagasiva@luckymojo.com (333): #> an easy standard. how does he prove it? Cavalorn: # Y'all _need_ to prove it? of COURSE. that is the point of providing the Thelemite Cushion Label atop which to set the Elite of the Cult. thereafter we can arbitrarily determine by our own prejudicial standards who it is that qualifies for the appellation which we have glorified beyond all reckoning. [and quoting from the Evul Book, that Crowleyite cult classic:] # 'Who calls us Thelemites will do do wrong'. I don't see the point # in calling _yourself_ any damn thing... the label seems to be # there for the benefit of others. of COURSE! and the entire focus of the cult is not how one might use the term oneSELF to indicate targets of admiration, but instead how to identify social authorities and betray the sovereignty of the individual to the System of the Master (he called himself the Master for a good reason, he knew the Slaves would not be long behind him). # Yes, there is benefit (up to a point) in having identifiers and # signposts - it makes things like this list possible, for one - but to # invest in a label-identity? Feh. (You may as well go for a fashion # statement like 'chaos magick' if you're going to do that. ;) ) now now, magical and religious groupies have been reformatting their favorite sources into unrecognizable clutter in order to put one over on the newbie for YEARS. is it so surprising that the newbies should then begin to think that there is a Certain Set Standard away from which one should not deviate when there were so many officious idiots proclaiming it so? and more surprising when those who got sick of it decided that their own inheritance from the same source should there- fore be called something which indicated its FREEDOM (i.e. "chaos")? you can hardly fault Chaos Magick as a subgroup of Thelema for wanting to distinguish itself from the stodgey Goldawnian authoritarian clusterfucks masquerading as the Last and Proud Inheritors of the World's Greatest Mysteries. this is far more than a mere fashion statement. it is more a POLITICAL statement. # I know I've called myself a Thelemite in the past, but having given the # matter a fair deal of thought I've come to the above conclusion. I'm not # saying I'm not one, but I'm not going to call myself one either. hey, 'bout time. I've contended this since I first entered into the 'Thelemic culture' decades ago and I've wondered when it would catch on (I have no idea what has brought it any degree of popularity but I'm certainly happy for it). # Besides, if you do start down the road of self-identification as a # 'Thelemite' then you inevitably get on to this whole brouhaha of whether # anyone has the _right_ to use that term. See elsewhere on this very # thread. that's correct, and then policies and rigid standards come into prominence for establishing the protocol for linguistic and award-winning usages. you have the devolution into 'Good Guy Badges' as LaVey has called them. suddenly you say with a big foisted pride "I am a Thelemite! Hear me ROAR!" all well and good, but then someone you don't like says it, and the competition to control the term begins (consider the example with 'Satanist' and 'Witch' elsewhere, though 'Thelemite' has a less controversial history). # There's _such_ a danger in fetishising the symbolic language and in # mistaking the shell of methodology for the object of the exercise. If # Thelema is a system indended to efficiently express one's identity, then # to call oneself a Thelemite is to say that the individual is dependent # upon the system, and not the other way around. The driver gets mistaken # for the vehicle. Next thing you know, you have orthodoxies, standards of # Thelemicness, 'official editions' and other ghastly horrors. too late, the Crowleyanity (Crowley insanity) has already begun. all we can do now is to argue against its inherent problems and hope that those who have been deceived by the babble of cultspeak learn to distinguish Thelema from Thelemitude. E666 333 nagasiva@luckymojo.com -- emailed replies may be posted; cc replies if response desired
![]() |
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
![]() |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|