THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.magick.order,alt.magick,talk.religion.misc,alt.thelema From: nagasiva@luckymojo.com (nigris (333)) Subject: Centralized Authority vs Thelema Date: 23 Jul 1999 23:36:32 -0700 49990203 IIIom here we go round the mulberry bush once more. :> E6 333: #> does doing the work include promulgating the Law of the Thelema? a correspondent writes: # ...it depends how it's done. I believe the rituals of this church # promolgate the Law. how, specifically, beyond the charity? # a formal structure, such as a church, could teach a person # freedom and responsibility and even, dare we say it, # direct gnosis and the idea that nothing but the self is needed # to be in direct communication with godhead. and that is the Law of Thelema? what is the difference between how this is instructed and, say, how the Pentacostals or other decentralized religious operate? is their instruction somehow different? what about quakers? are there any studies by EGC members of religious through the ages and what failed in their movements (esp. those like gnostics, anabaptists, quakers)? if so, are there any instructional papers on this? # It's almost as though such lessons would lead one to believe # that no formal church is necessary. And it's not, for the gnosis # part. Which brings us back to the community part.... what prevents a rigidification of spiritual authority along the lines of organizational authority within the church? #> wherein the point was made that the regularization could rationally #> be objected to on the grounds that it destabilized PERSONAL power, #> and therefore jeopardized the promulgation of the Law. # I can see how regularization *could* destabalize personal # power, but not that it *has to*. do you see how it has time and time again? do you think that this was the result of some human flaw, specific temporal, genetic or philosophic weakness, or do you think it may be possible that the STRUCTURE of a church simply doesn't make it realizable for long? # It has a lot to do with how a given individual interacts with # the Church - what they think it means to belong to a Church, # whether or not they empower the Church in their own minds, etc. given the predominant instruction from the society around the individual ("listen to organizations, they are more reliable than your inner knowledge, seek to empower organizations and to disempower yourselves so that they can help you"), do you think that operating along conventional lines does anything to prevent the wilting of the Thelemic flower in the EGC or (c)OTO? #> charity and life-transition rites are a pretty important aspect of #> the Order's business, but NOT at the expense of its prime objectives. # # D'accord. At the moment, I see no actual evidence that the prime # objective of the Order is being backburnered or tossed aside.... what would such evidence look like? is the church instructing its membership in how to look for this corruptive symptom so that it can be eliminated in root? if you don't study the evil before it starts, how can you prevent it from corrupting your edifice? # I hear people talking about feeling like this could happen - and # they are right, it could. All the more reason to be awake and # vigilant and dare I say - thelemic in one's approach to life. what does that include, this approach to life? for me it has included belonging to as few organizations as possible and generally putting them through excruciating analysis prior to my firm alliance. it includes being willing to be the 'trouble- maker' and 'gadfly' rather than merely to nod and wink at how 'good' we're doing. what does it include for you? what do you think are your obligations in terms of retaining the purity of your church, and are these instructed by its authorities so as not to slip by a generation? #> # Furthermore, there is nothing in the fact that EGC is a church #> # within O.T.O. (which, btw, is exactly what Reuss and AC intended #> # if that matters to you - it does to the O.T.O.) that precludes #> # individuals not interested in group membership or church #> # participation from studying and performing the Gnostic Mass in #> # their own temples, in whatever way they find most effective. #> #> ah but look what happened to all those old aeon "churches" that #> got hung up on THEIR tar baby scriptures. while I proclaim that #> the Evul Book is an explosive VSL, #> Crowley has gone and made it #> a STANDARD such that now the OTO is a _religious body_, advancing #> some distance beyond the Freemasons in terms of its cultic #> qualities and disempowering biblioworship. # # I'm not exactly sure how the one leads to the other, brother. # Or how this statement answers the one I made. my point is that churches tend to be destructive of the Law, by virtue of their dogmatic attachments and hierarchic structure. if not at first, then later. what the church now "allows" can and is likely to change based on the winds of authority that pass through its sails. Crowley DEstabilized the Order by rigidifying its VSL into a scripture. by installing himself into a prophetic position. rather than, say, establishing a precedent whereby everyone is encouraged to write their own damn holy book, he goes and enshrines HIS pamphlet as the be-all and end-all. a regular Muhammad. it's been done, and I think it may have been an error which we ought to correct. further standardization and rigidification seems to me a step in exactly the wrong direction. #> as a VSL it makes sense, but as a scripture it is hazardous, # # Okay, define your terms. "Scripture" and "VSL". Similarities? # Differences? described above. the scripture is concretized. the VSL varies based on the individual. you see the difference? the power is taken OUT of the hands of the individual on the basis of choice of text and a pittance is returned on the basis that the text in question contains a multiplicity of self-contradiction unseen by previous bibliolatres. it is a huge price to pay for what may be turn out to be a merely *pretense* of liberty. #> as the various cultists that spin out of the Crowleyite culture #> have demonstrated time and time again. # Would you say that these cultish people have "decided for # themselves" and come to conclusions you find repulsive, or # are you suggesting that there is some kind of groupthink # going on here? I'm suggesting that the structure and mindset of the religious is contrary to the liberating philosophy Thelema ought to be, and that only certain forms of organization are likely to become real standards for this Law. I'm saying that these individuals are examples of what COULD happen with this church were the wrong people to get in charge, driving it off course and perhaps onto the rocks. that's the problem with pyramidal authority structures where cadres or single individuals can muck up the works. #> it is dangerous to the #> potential that an organized body (or movement) might contain in #> liberating the human species from its own self-destructiveness #> and org-centric anti-individualism. # # I've read this sentence several times and I can't make sense # of it. Please re-phrase. Thelemites have the potential to liberate the human species from our own self-destructiveness and our propensity to place undue faith in organizations to the detriment of individual sovereignty. the days of corporate identity and authority are OVER, and this is one of the principles spearheaded by such documents as the US Bill of Rights which protects the individual from the abuse of such entities. Old Aeonic structures such as hierarchies are important in the establishment of a vanguard, but when they begin to become rigidified and cultic, then they become dangerous to the movement as a whole, losing sight of the principles which made them valuable. cults of personality (Crowleyanity) and bibliophilia (Evul Books) are not conducive except as obstacles to organizations otherwise ostensibly dedicated to seeing the Law established as the law (a long-term goal inherently making possible the discarding of the state as a political body and freeing human potential to its maximum application). at some point they get in the WAY of the promulgation by virtue of the energetic space they begin to occupy in the consciousness of the cult and how this applies to their role in the outlying society ("damn Crowley-fanatics"). #> according to this logic, the promulgation of the Law of the Thelema #> (an essentially individualistic and liberating principle) will just #> have to wait while cultists who appropriate the name set about #> trying to "avoid being burnt at the stake for one's beliefs". # I don't really hear that viewpoint expressed by the group of # individuals that the long lost and deeply missed (by me) Tim # Maroney once referred to as my "upper management." but individuals like Donald could become part of that upper management. what prevents that? how are you going to prevent the fanatics from taking over the church at some point? #> the individual falls away as 'less important' as compared to the #> group, the cult, as bonds, rules and restrictions become the idols #> in a worship of nothing more than the Prophet (final, no doubt) #> and the ecclesiastical monster he reassembled along Thelemic lines. # # Yuck. When/if I perceive that is what is occurring, I hope # that you will join me in running away very quickly. NO! that is precisely what I am attempting to avoid. rather than wait until the ship is infested with rats, I am attempting to go about studying rats in ships, asking whether this or that animal I find in ships constitute a rat, and asking the ship-hands whether they have been trained in the art of rat-catching, rat-killing or at least rat-extraction. fleeing the ship is contrary to the very principles upon which I am here operating, and I hope you will assist me in my objective by being vigilant against an infestation, not minding too much if I become alarmed occasionally at your expressions which sound something like 'that galley sure does store cheese well'. :> # Um, I must admit that I also can make no sense of that sentence. substitute this, then (which I haven't the faintest how it escaped): Donald: #> ...sooner or later you will gladly accept the wisdom of the #> 'current leadership' as they struggle to establish a legal #> and constitutional OTO, from which weall benefit. # the legal battle is how the (c)OTO got its name, in reflection # of the Caliphate grappling for copyrights. it is a religious # organization with 501c3 status and the ability to retain its # copyrights and trademarks supported by the Ninth Circuit Court # of Appeals. # # as regards the constitution, which one? Crowley's? you like # is Revolutionaries? or should it be 'refined' before adopted? # the Knight of Salad Forks says that he saw visions of railroad # cars for every member in the Order's plan. where does the # "benefit" stop and the corruption begin? better? E666 nagasiva@luckymojo.com (nigris (333)) -- emailed replies may be posted; cc replies if response desired
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|