![]() |
THE |
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.satanism,alt.magick.tyagi,alt.magick.chaos From: "Mr. Scratch"Subject: Re: Satanism, Shadow, Chaos and K@s Date: Wed, 15 Feb 1995 12:30:57 -0800 For those who are unfamiliar with the subconscious impulse known to psychologists as "the shadow": Everyone carries a shadow, and the less it is embodied in the individual's conscious life, the blacker and denser it is. At all counts it forms an unconscious snag, thwarting our most well meaning intentions. -Jung The shadow is the personal unconscious; it is all those uncivilized desires and emotions that are incompatible with social standards and our ideal personality, all that we are ashamed of that we do not want to know about ourselves. It follows that the narrower and more restrictive the society in which we live, the larger will be our shadow. -Fordham, _An_Introduction_to_Jung_. The Shadow is our unrecognized, unwanted "darker-half". It appears to exist and react almost independently of our conscious-selves, yet it shapes and molds our behavior, often in ways we do not want. The shadow it the "devil" on your shoulder, telling you to do what you know you shouldn't. (Yes, this even applies to Satanists!) One of the most obvious and dangerous aspects of the shadow is that, in our efforts to separate ourselves from it (and all the things we secretly dislike about ourselves) we project the rejected characteristics onto others, and symbolically seek to harm, discredit or destroy them. In this way, the shadow has us chasing our own tails. On 13 Feb 1995, TOKUS wrote: > Kali Yuga 49950213 > > "Mr. Scratch" quotes Dr.NEMO III and writes: > > |the personal shadow is far too painful and threatening to examine or > |confront, so it is left to its own monstrous means (the rather stupid > |and unethical behavior that is commonplace in this movement). > > |My only complaint with Chaos' example is that they applied the former but > |neglected the latter. > > That is a valuable criticism of the model. Thank you. As you claim to > have extensive experience with Jung's Shadow concept, do you have any > suggestions as to whether I would need to delve my own shadow in order > to tie directly into that of society, or whether I might be able to > manifest a reflection of society's Shadow without drawing upon my own > shadow for substance. Is it possible that they are in some sense > concentric as I have speculated, the societal containing the individual? > One of the tricky things about dealing with the social shadow as opposed to the individual shadow, is that it is possible to emotionally separate yourself from society and gain something of an outsider's view. It is difficult to do this with oneself, however. Hence, the manifestations of the collective usually seem more obvious, especially if one rejects the taboos and restriction of that society. But how does one go about TRULY rejecting ONE'S OWN values and restrictions? The things we hold at our very core? One must be able to do this, (at least temporarily) if one is to catch even a peripheral glimpse of ones own shadow. How to do this? You will have to explore this on your own, though I recommend reading Zweig's _Meeting the Shadow_, a collection of shadow essays. Should you delve into your own shadow in order to reflect that of society? From my own experience, I have found that it is easier to identify society's shadow now that I have struggled to become aware of my own. I feel that I can better identify in others what I had once rejected in myself. The key here is to IDENTIFY the shadow elements and not to fight them. The shadow is far less formidable when it is exposed to the daylight of consciousness, than when it is fought and pushed down deeper into the primordial subconscious where it actually thrives. Is it possible to manifest a reflection of society's shadow without drawing upon your own shadow for substance? By "drawing upon your own shadow", I take it you mean some form of projection. The answer: I don't know. I would be interested in your results if you decide to try this. I have my doubts, as I think one would have to be emotionally motivated to do such a thing. If you are working against something out of a sense of justice or some direct emotional fulfillment, than there is a good chance that one sees in the "opposition" an element of yourself that you would like to further repress. If you are interested in maintaining some degree of control over society though, learning to harness the shadow would be a powerful means of approach. As a side note about the shadow and our sense of "justice", I saw an interesting example on TV, surrounding the Susan Smith case. (Smith is the woman who reported her kids stolen, but it was later discovered that she drowned them herself.) When people were out looking for the kids, the searchers seemed to come from all walks of life. Once the truth had come to light, the crowd of followers narrowed to a select group of people with a vested interest. The crowds of people screaming and jeering Smith as she was led to jail were comprised mostly of women, anywhere from their late 20s to early 50s. The DA had to return 1000s in donations from people who demanded her execution. I would be willing to lay down money that there was a high percentage of mothers among them. Could it be that this was a massive attempt for mothers to reinforce their repression of their own infanticidal urges? Such an event would surely force mothers to acknowledge the possibility of murdering their children (I am told this is a common impulse among mothers) and for some, the best means of repressing this urge would be to strike out directly at the outside "source". One woman I saw held her child above her head as Smith was being escorted away and screamed something to the effect of "This is my baby! I would never kill my baby! I would never kill my baby!". If her feelings toward her child were never in doubt, why such an overwhelming display? Why were her sentiments directed toward herself? > tyagi/TOKUS > ----------- --Mr Scratch P.S; The new Smoking Mirror Pylon of the ToS is doing indepth research on the shadow and it's Black Magic applications. Interested Setians may E-mail me for more info.
![]() |
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
![]() |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|