THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.satanism,alt.magick.tyagi,alt.pagan,talk.religion.misc From: tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com (nocTifer) Subject: FAQs about Satanism (was Re: Satanism FAQ) Date: 27 Dec 1997 11:44:35 -0800 49971227 aa2 Hail Satan! "Underground Panther": >nocTifer did this newsgroup two of them even. :> I intend to expand this. >a great service by posting CoS Rev. Matt Paradise's FAQ on Satanism, >Aquino's ToS FAQ on Satanism, and his own FAQ on Satanism and The >Great Martyrdom Cult. well, TOKUS's, but I admit I wrote it. :> I'm glad you found it so serviceful. at the TOKUS Website there are even two more I ran across in various net-wanderings (previous alt.satanism FAQ, plus IRC's #satanist Satanism FAQ). >By comparing the three FAQs an intelligent person may work >through different concepts and actually THINK. watch out. it might be painful, especially the first few times. >Does the atheist worship "athe".... is a ventriloquist >a worshiper of "Ventriloqus"?? When why should the term >"Satanist" be a worshiper of Satan? if the Satanist designs it so. >Satanism: a religion of the self, a ritualization of our own >atheistic potentials, antagonistic to Christian principles by >natural inclination. that's a lovely definition, sure. >Belief and Worship were not engaged in by Satan in the Myths, come now, this is a bit of an overgeneralization. I suppose it depends on what one accepts of "the Myths", but at least in Muslim tales Iblis/Shaitan worshipped Allah, some say SHe was the most dedicated and beloved of all the angels, even after 'the Fall'. >at least not after the Fall, again, I think that this might be over-reaching. there are so many different perspectives on Satan, from the Romantic poets to Milton, Dante, Shaw, others. belief is certainly an element in some of even these post-Heavenly Satans. some Satans don't even require the Heavenly episode, portraying Yahweh as just another tribal blowhard with an inflated ego spreading false stories about his having made everything. an example is my own anti-Milton poem at: http://www.abyss.com/text/satanism/theory/tokuslip.html >so a Satan or Satanist shouldn't have to Believe or Worship >either. no religious has to believe or worship. these are the requirements of certain herds for membership, nothing more. >Presumably, someone who believed in the Devil and God might say >God was lying a lot and Satan got fed up with it, and Satan isn't even the only Devil, Yahweh not the only God. >so if Satan doesn't believe God's lies, why should a Satanist >believe Christianity's lies and myths in general?? precisely my point above. consider the Hindu-vs.-Zoroastrian cosmologies: for one the devas are the heros, the asuras the antagonists; for the other they are reversed. who to believe? perhaps they were both mistaken. Gnostics, Luciferians, Yezidis, Muslims, Jews, Christians, Satanists; they all seem to have different ideas about how things came to be and how they now stand, and yet the elements of their religions have many points of overlap and intersection. variety is the spice that makes Satanism so valuable. >That's assuming you believe that bunk about the devil and god. there you go! and then there are all the devils who were just pre-Christian gods, and the gods who weren't any sort of cosmic Creator. the First Cause explanation can get old! >I like the stories and identify with Satan, but I'm no chump! >POSITION OF XTIANS: Satanists must by definition be chumps!! >POSITION OF SATANISTS: Satanists by definition must be pretty >damn clever and skeptical!! indeed, this is the divide I have labelled 'condemnation vs. identification'. Christian usage of 'Satan' and 'Satanist' (sometimes 'satanist') tends to be critical, comdemning, and ascribing all manner of evils and flaws to those with whom they associate the terms. these are 'the outsiders' who are responsible for all that these conservative Christians can't stomach to ascribe to their "all-powerful" god. contrariwise, the Satanist is describing HIRSELF with this term, and some ideal or entity of value with 'Satan'. there is a more respectful function of identification going on. one might as well say that 'Christian' is a description of weak-minded, cannibalistic, exclusivist monotheists bent on enslaving the world to their ignorant dogmas. then 'Christian' becomes the condemnatory term. it is relative to one's desires and the political effect of language use. blessed beast! tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com (nocTifer) -- (emailed replies may be posted); http://www.hollyfeld.org/~tyagi; 408/2-666-SLUG join the esoteric syncretism in alt.magick.tyagi; http://www.abyss.com/tokus
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|