THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick From: tim@toad.com (Tim Maroney) Subject: Roots of the Occult (Excerpts) Date: 17 Jan 1995 02:01:51 GMT ...Don [Frew] is a friend of mine, a leader in an emerging movement known as "Progressive Wicca," a freethinker, and not at all conservative. When I get tired of people on the nets screaming at me for, say, pointing out that _Aradia_ has Satanic elements, or stating that Yahweh is a form of The God, I can always go talk to Don to reassure myself that pagans aren't a bunch of dogmatic idiots. As is widely known, he's open to the idea that monotheistic god-forms are worth working with, skeptical of the Murray/Ginzburg idea of the survival of witchcraft from medieval witchcraft to the present, very much aware of the intimacy of the relationship between modern paganism and other forms of esoteric tradition, and in short, the near opposite of the conservative position on almost all the issues I consider significant. I honestly have no idea how you could have gotten the idea that he's conservative. If he is, then I guess I am too! Who'd'a thunk it? [major deletia] The actual date of the Canon Episcopi is unknown. It has been erroneously dated back as far as 314 CE, but the first surviving text appears in 906 CE -- the tenth century, not the ninth. It became part of the Canon Law two centuries later. Exactly which "abandoned women perverted by Satan" professed that "they ride upon certain beasts with the pagan goddess Diana" through the sky is really anyone's guess, if in fact there were any. It's possible that this is an nth-generation allusion to the flight of Medea in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Many other explanations are also possible. The cult hypothesis is very far from demonstrated by the Canon Episcopi. [previous T. Maroney] >: The more you look at the history of modern Western esotericism, the >: more the distinctions blur. Everybody has been borrowing from >: everybody else since well before Gardner's time, and all our traditions >: share certain unusual assumptions and methods. When people insist that >: there is some strong distinction between "paganism" and "Wicca", or >: "New Age" and "occultism", or "paganism" and "occultism", those should >: be interpreted as political statements rather than historical or >: philosophical ones. There are more similarities than differences. [more deletia] ...Obviously there are distinctions, just as there's a distinction between the Gardnerian tradition and NROOGD, but in many cases the distinction turns out to be on the order of saying Merlin instead of Raphael in (effectively) the same ritual. "This is a dog license with the word 'dog' scratched out and the word 'cat' written in in crayon!" People who insist that paganism and occultism are two completely distinct traditions -- and who usually add some degree of abuse directed at the other tradition -- are mistaken. Their insistence on this strong differentiation is more properly viewed as political rather than as historical, anthroplogical, or philosophical. For anyone seriously examining Western esoteric traditions, it is necessary to recognize an overarching continuity of traditions, marked by such concrete tags as direct textual borrowings, shared symbols, and common ritual structures. Many people deny that there is any such continuity. [additional deletia] ...I've worked with three esoteric Christian groups: the Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica, the Ecclesia Gnostica Mysteriorum, and the Pre-Nicene Gnostics. All three were clearly related to each other, and had a very significant membership overlap with other esoteric traditions and groups, such as "Circle Paganism," Thelema, Hellenian revivalism, and so forth. I believe they're all derived from the See of Antioch through Bishop Leadbeater, the Theosophical leader most associated with esoteric Christianity. There's no question to me that they're part of the continuity of esoteric tradition in the West, and that they're more similar to other parts of that continuum than they are to mainstream Christianity. Whether they are "essentially the same" is another question entirely, and one which does not have much meaning to me. They are parts of a larger continuum of tradition, but each also has their own unique features. If they were to deny their connection with, say, Theosophy, or Martinism, they would be incorrect, and I would tend to think their disavowals were motivated by a political urge to disassociate themselves from some disliked group. If someone were to claim they were all exactly the same thing, that would also be incorrect. -- Tim Maroney. Please CC all public responses to tim@toad.com.
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|