THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.religion.all-worlds From: Paul HumeSubject: Re: Panfidelity Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 22:24:37 -0500 David - History teaches us that paleolithic humans worshipped > the goddess, and also were matriarchial. You dispute this? History teaches nothing of the sort. It is not so much that I dispute it (I do, but never mind) since my credentials are as popular and based on second-hand sources as your own, but the folks out in the field digging upteh material do NOT universally agree with the late Dr. Gimbutas. Hutton, for one, in Pagan Religions of Great Britain, points out that themodel of some kind of inescapable Goddess cult in neolithic times is subject to significant challenge by history teachers, as it were. > One final good reference, page 72-73, __Dreaming the Dark__, by > Starhawk, she said: > "When we turn to the religions of immanence, whether we call them > Witchcraft, or Paganism, or polytheism,or spirituality, whether we draw on > sources from Celtic, Greek, Native American, Eastern, or African > mythology, we encounter paradox. We encounter the God/dess: the all, the > interwoven fabric of being, the dance, the weaver -- we say -- and the web > of connection, the pattern, the spiral. "She," we call her. But She is > before sex; She whose name cannot be spoken because She is the circle -- > before it is broken by a name that separates-out." > Citing a Neopagan author who defines a position that you agree with doesn't prove anything, as I am sure you know. It simply illustrates that you agree with Starhawk's syncretistic view of Goddesses. > I stand by my position that "real pagans" worship an immanent god/dess. And I repat that this is "real" only in the context of Neopagans, and has squat to do with the peoples whose religon you seek to recreate. > This is not to say that some people can be "make-believe" or "near" > pagans, as many people who call themselves "Christians"... Etc. Which comes to the crus, Dave, that you seem to be playing this theme so you can be "better than" Neopagans who don't believe in a (solely) immanent Deity, or who do not otherwise truckle to this view of Deity. It is the abiding curse of Neopaganism that it seems insufficient to modernize one's own belief, but that people then move on to try and denigrate Pagans who don't share that belief. Dammit, man, even modern Pagans with an unbroken chain of belief - Shintoists for example - distinguish between immanent and transcendent Deity, and recognize both. Paul
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|