THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.magick,alt.mythology,alt.pagan.magick,sci.psychology.theory,alt.psychology.jung From: Solar-PhallusSubject: Jung Cult, Archetype Dogma 50030620 VIII PISCES-AGE-Y2006 from my outbox: > ...Archetypes are not found in the brain..they are not created > by evolution and do not have their roots in science but in > mysticism. are they to be found at all, or are they just imagined? how can we distinguish between the real and the imaginary when there is no criteria for distinguishing between what you are calling the 'spiritual' and what I call the 'imagined'? > Yes, I'm suggesting that there is a spiritual realm where > consciousness exists outside of the brain and physical > body and that this is where this information is stored > for us to access.... that's a fantasy. it's unfortunate that occultism and mysticism have been deluded by this false dualism, but there is it. please point me to something that you take to be contrary evidence to my assertion. if you would like to refute me by asking me (as many have) how I would contrariwise explain the phenomenon of subjective experience with relation merely to brains and evolution, then I can do so easily with reference to the dual-character of consciousness (experiencER and experiencED; subject and object) which requires no fantasy realms that cannot be observed outside the minds of religious converts. > One way to convince oneself of the concept of archetypes .... one might convince oneself of the reality of irrational things, but is this truly valuable? what will it do to help us apprehend the real, if we are fabricating fictions and treating them like they have been confirmed before we even scrutinize and doubt them? this is why I have maintained that Noll is *correct* in identifying Jungians as religious (he uses the correct term in his description: "cult") and archetypes as religious dogmas. to another, not me, the same author wrote: > ...this is you saying that there are no archetypes? > Why do you say that? Again, I do not believe that proof > of this will ever exist..you cannot measure something in > scientific terms if it is not of the material world and > this is why so many things which are now attracting huge > amounts of attention will never be able to be proven. > And they don't need to be.....now, I'm really not > suggesting that we need to take things on faith alone... > I think that's something that the religious believe is > important/key to their path of following one religion vs. > another religion, but I'm suggesting that we can have > and honor knowledge which is obtained by combining our > observation skills with our intuition and our intellect > and come to our own conclusions which are rooted in > "enough proof" to be applicable as tools in our life... > and yes, in our tarot readings as well. the burden of proof rests in the laps of those who make the more outrageous and unusual claims as compared with other agreed knowledge. you claim an entire "spiritual realm" but offer no evidence of its reality beyond the imagination of mystics and religious (whom I call the deluded and deceived). I am not saying that what you're trying to explain is illusory, just that your theories for explaining it are irrational and require a greater burden of proof than you (or those like you) have heretofore been able to meet with clear evidence. the religious consistently opaque, obscure, and cover over knowledge (which is derived from science, and not just materialist science, by the way) for the purpose of making the universe seem more simple, controlled, and human-centered than it really is. part of the work of those interested in *truth* is the application of critical thinking to unravel and dissolve the fantasies which obsess religious and mystical converts, whether these are encountered in the study of tarot, astronomy, time, or the condition and history of all known things. when someone says "archetypes are fictions" or claims that they aren't universal, are conditioned and are accrued as most other databits in enculturation as one develops and grows within a culture, then your job is to point out what you have discovered beyond the expressions of religious and mystics which supports these fantastic notions, if you wish to be convincing. thanks. Solar-Phallus nagasiva@luckymojo.com -- yronwode.com@nagasiva; http://www.satanservice.org/ emailed replies may be posted; cc replies if response desired; HOODOO CATALOGUE! send street addy to: catalogue@luckymojo.com
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|