![]() |
THE |
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: talk.religion.newage,talk.religion.misc,alt.pagan,alt.magick,alt.magick.tyagi,alt.divination,alt.occult,alt.pagan.magick From: tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com (hara) Subject: Re: Syncretism and Cultural Respect (was Re: Q(uib)BL(ing)....) Date: 4 Jan 1999 12:59:23 -0800 49990104 IIIom shalom alechem, my kin. hara (tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com): #> what is the most responsible and respectful way to syncretize #> from world mystical systems and cultures? catherine yronwode (cat@luckymojo.com): # I think that the most responsible way is to retain all references to # original writers and to make very clear all cultural-ethnic ascriptions. that makes alot of sense to me. it would also be valuable to discern to what ends one was putting the material, as well as within what context and to explain how that might be different from that of the original. of course we're talking about scholarly desires -- the practical folks don't always bother to credit or even skeptically analyze the source of what they find useful. #> how can it done while #> still playing with the ideologies, value-systems, religious #> beliefs and internal psychospiritual models and still retain an #> attitude of honor for that from which we might draw? # ...Can one "play" with another's culture or religion while # showing it "honour"? I think one can employ intellectual perspectives and magical and mystical tools to one's own ends without dishonoring them or the culture from which they come, yes. some of it would be providing credit where credit is due, some of it would be the respectful treatment of the psychotechnologies (e.g. methods of meditation) so engaged and communicated. admiring the source rather than deprecating or omitting it would be a start, coming to some understanding during the course of experimentation what goals and personal qualities of the mystical discipline there may be (study of the context of the source would be valuable here) would also be important. #> what names #> shall we provide to that which we create which simultaneously #> calls attention to the fact that what we've made is a novelty #> and that we have drawn on the important work of others whose #> traditions gave specific identifiers? # Appending the term "neo" -- as in "neo-tantra" -- is useful to avoid # confusion between a indigenous system and a syncretic one. it is unfortunate that this linguistic identifier has been used, in many modern writings, as a means of dismissal, though this is certainly not the case across the annals of history. how often has the novel cultural usage been so identified? what I'm asking here is something like whether Neoplatonists described themselves as such as they arose. and what about the Neopythagoreans? I do notice that very many Neopagans identify as 'Pagans', though they have an abiding desire to appear ancient (perhaps we all do). I think that Scholem did a service to us in his usage of prepended characterization ("Christian Kabbalah") and I will continue to use his method and my spelling variations, as well as specifying my "universalist QBL" hypotheses when describing Christian cabala and Hermetic qabalah until I come to discover that that to which these refer do not deserve the names. I would of course agree that changing NOTHING in the label is charlatanry and deceptive. # "Neo-kaballism" sounds good to me to describe the Golden Dawn style # kaballism of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. a very worthy suggestion. inasmuch as it may not even be a kind of qabalism, I think there is an argument to be made that even this is too complimentary (since it may not approach a Christian cabala and may really serve as a kind of magical filing system of association). my intent is to continually contrast these against one another as I learn about each, asking those who promote them to assist me in this and to see whether even Scholem's usage is overly-complimentary (as you have suggested offline) -- something which is quite possible. peace be with you, hara -- tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com (emailed replies may be posted); cc me replies; http://www.abyss.com/tokus; http://www.luckymojo.com/mojocatSPELLS.html
![]() |
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
![]() |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|