THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick,alt.magick.tyagi,alt.pagan.magick,alt.occult From: richard spriggSubject: Re: english qaballa and racist agendae (was re: gematria and ...) Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 00:05:41 -0500 catherine yronwode wrote: (snip of historical data, purely for space) > In stripping the kaballah of its "Jewish" history, in declaring that > they were revealing a "new" kabbalah for their "New Aeon," Not quite. Crowley does point out that "My kabbalah is not yours" on several points in his writings. He advises students to go to the sources, in the original language if possible. I honestly think that in the context of early 20th century society, that he had problems finding original sources. The message of the new aeon would find *any* exclusion unacceptable. "The word of sin is restriction". > The historical ignorance of some modern Thelemites, when displayed in > usenet, may lead contemporary Jewish-American occultists to accuse them > of being insensitive to the Jewish origin of the kaballah. If such > Thelemites persist in their disbelief of history to the point of asking > for "proof" of the kaballah's Jewishness, they may be accused of > outright racism by impatient Jews (among whom i number myself). Depends upon the inquiry, methinks: to try and find an earlier tradition that may mesh with an earlier religion is simply scientific enquiry. To enquire into the nature of a relatively recent tradition in Judaist thought is hardly racism: to meet serious enquiry with cries of anti-semetism is to debase the term, and to make it less abhorrent. I regard that concept with a cold shudder. > > Perhaps the cause of this conflict between "New Aeon" kabbalists and > Jewish occultists is not Crowley's disbelief in the Jewishness of the > kaballah (surely he knew of it!) Indeed he did. That much is clear from his writings. Also clear is his evident respect for the "Holy Quabbalah", and by extension, those who developed it. , but rather that an a-historic > generation of contemporary Thelemites puts their complete trust in > flawed or incomplete teachings which have falsely led tthem to think > that "their" kaballah, as revealed by their lineage-founder, Mr. > Crowley, is not Jewish in its root. The curse of the magus is to speak truth, and see it twisted into untruth. This is nothing new. The persecutions you mention earlier, including blaming the Jews for the black death, came from a church founded in memory of a Jew. > > That's all just speculation, of course, but, as Neil Fernandez points > out here, and as Tim ("the American Qabalist") noted in usenet, there > are more than a few Crowleyites running around loose who don't know that the kaballah is Jewish. They are fools. Anyone who fails to follow the river to a source is a fool. These are the people who *need* instructions on a shampoo bottle. > > Perhaps some Thelemite reading this can be encouraged to explain to the > rest of us why so many Thelemites are, as Neil says, "unaware of the > history of Jewish kabbalah as a '(magical/spiritual) tradition in its > own right'...[and] see it rather as a set of techniques...or as a > 'language'." As a Thelemite for over twenty five years, I have no idea: when I want to understand points of QBL, I have correspondents in Israel that I can ask. If I want to understand a point of Hermetic Kabbalah, there are other individuals I will ask. > > Are the words "technique" and "language" part of the instruction-set > accompanying Thelemite teaching of the kaballah? Likely back to the GD and before, this approach has been used by hermeticists. I am unaware of any specific intent to ignore the source or the context of development. Not being a member of any order, I xcannot comment on what or how they impart the knowledge. I will comment in passing that decent ckabbalistic literature has only become available fairly recently: going back to the late 60's there was practically nothing to be had outside Regardie, Fortune, Mathers et al. > > It seems to be a common conception among Gentiles that the kaballah has > fallen into disuse or disinterest among Jews or that few Jews study it > and when they do, they do so in solitude. I am not sure why this is > thought to be so; perhaps it has to do with the Jewish tendency toward > maintining a low profile, True. Jewish sources can be tough to obtain for a goy. Individuals can be prickly, too. In the rush to study, it can be overlooked that treating an individual's culture as an object of study can be offensive. Native americans often express the same concerns. regards richard
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|