![]() |
THE |
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick From: mika93@yahoo.com (mika) Subject: Re: Golems Date: 14 Jan 2003 10:53:22 -0800 Taliszannawrote in message news: ... > On 8 Jan 2003, Sun Wu-K'ung wrote: > > > Taliszanna wrote in message news: ... > > > On 2 Jan 2003, Sun Wu-K'ung wrote: > > >> > A 'dybbuk' is not a golem. They are opposites. A dybbuk is a > bad > > > > spirit. A golem is a 'souless' person. > > > > > > What about the results of your common 'love spell'? They tend to produce > > > zombies of a sort if they actually work. How do these compare? Is it the > > > difference between spiritless and soul-less, there? > > > > Tali, I really hope that the above paragraph is just a brainfart and > > not an example of your usual train of thought. > > > > -Pilgrim > > > Excuse me, but was it your intention to be rude? It is not as > though golems and dybbuks are common knowledge -- at least not to someone > in my area of the world. There are few Jews in my city, let alone > anyone who studies the Kabbalah and, as I understand it, those who do > study the Book wouldn't permit me to study with them (being as I'm > female). I know close to nothing about Jewish mysticism as a result and > that is through no fault of my own. I'm asking an honest question to > learn. Perhaps it sounds like a newbie question to you, (which I'm > guessing it must, from your reaction), but perhaps have if you stop and > put yourself in the shoes of someone who has only heard these words a few > times now you will see that the question is not so silly. It's like if you > were to hear about some creature called a 'zybeth'; you've never heard > that word before (or maybe just once or twice). For someone to talk down > to you just because you don't know what that is and are trying to find > something else to compare it to, is terribly uncouth. Manners, please. Taliszanna, There are many books available on Jewish Kabbalah that you can read to learn about it on your own. Personally, I'd start with "God is a Verb" by Rabbi David Cooper, to give you a flavor of modern Jewish mysticism. I also highly reccomend "The Sabbath" by Abraham Joshua Heschel. Aryeh Kaplan wrote many good books, including "Meditation and the Kabbalah", and interpretations of the Sefer Yetzirah, the Bahir and the Zohar, which are primary "source material" for Jewish Kabbalah. Actually, I'm not sure if he has a book translation of the Zohar in print, but there are others out there too. The difference between a dybbuk and a golem, simply speaking, is that a dybbuk has a spirit without a body and a golem has a body without a spirit (or soul). We can get into a debate about the difference between spirit and soul in relation to Jewish mysticism and kabbalah, but the distinction isn't really important for this basic description. The point is, the golem is basically dirt/clay that is animated through the will/magick of its creator, it is not animated by an inborn soul/spirit. So as far as love spells go, if you think that they work by turning people into 'zombies' of a sort (I think I get what you're saying...) it's actually a different issue. If you take the approach that a spell reprograms someone according to your will, which essentially turns them into zombies, you're still talking about beings that have souls or spirits. In the common use of the word 'golem', people cannot be turned into golems, as far as I understand it. (This may be a point of religious debate, really, but I'm trying to give a general overview. Don't take my description as Jewish dogma, it's just my current understanding.) Metaphysically speaking, personally, yeah I think 'golem' can be an appropriate way to describe much of the "walking dead", "domesticated primates", "robots", "ambulatory meat", euphemism of your choice - because many people are little more than animated "clay". But that would be a very very non-traditional use of the word. In a way, humans are golems created by God, with the ability to self-replicate, and the *potential* to become something more. We are animated earth and nothing more, until self-reflection, until we become our own creators. At least one Jewish Kabbalist's interpretation of creation is that God tried to create man 3 times - the first time, man was only of the earth with no spirit, the second time, man was all spirit and no earth (the angels), neither of which were sustainable (I'll skip the esoteric details). Finally, a bit of earth and a bit of spirit combined provided the right conditions. Anyway, tangent.... Hope that helps. Please ask any more questions, I'll see what I can do or what references might be useful.
![]() |
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
![]() |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|