![]() |
THE |
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.bible.prophecy,alt.christnet,alt.religion.christian,alt.christnet.bible,alt.athiesm,talk.atheism,talk.origins From: mls@panix.com (Michael L. Siemon) Subject: Re: Explaination of Jesus not being born in december. Date: Wed, 25 Dec 1996 19:50:33 -0500 In article <01bbf2ab$6a37ecc0$19ce77cc@mpainter>, "Michael D. Painter"wrote: +December 25th was a miscalculation of Dec 21st the real solstice. ??? December 25th was the date of the solstice after Julius Caesar's institution of a Roman solar calendar. The inaccuracy of that calendar with respect to the tropical year (its 365.25 days per year versus the more accurate (and non constant) 365.2421896698...) led to a shift in the quarter dates (solstice and equinox) by ~2.8 days at the time of the Nicene Council (which concerned itself indirectly with calendric matters, in determining a rule -- dissociated from the Jewish luni-solar calendar -- for celebrating the Paschal feast central to Christianity. When Gregory promulgated the 16th century redress of this problem in the Julian calendar, he also promulgated a return of ancient solstice and equinox dates, but not a return to those at the time of Jesus, but to those at the time of Nicea. [At the time of Jesus' birth, in other words, and to be totally explicit, the winter solstice *was* near the date of Dec. 25th; in Constantine's time it was near Dec. 21st.] And yes, on some of your other points, there were other dates named in Christian sources for the birth of Jesus before ever Dec. 25th was mentioned (in any extant source), and obviously no common opinion of Christians on this point. The Dec. 25th date seems to have become a principal one also in the time of Constantine, hence some 3+ centuries after the fact. People who are desperate to defend the "traditional" date really should deal honestly with the fact that it is a relatively late tradition, that won out over a number of competing (and to all appearances, earlier) ones. Elaborate arguments that "defend" the Dec. 25th dating are pointless if not offered with some honest treatment of the mere fact that it was *not* "the date of Christmas" for several centuries after Christ's birth. -- Michael L. Siemon mls@panix.com Awaslah jabberwok adek, rahang mengigit, kuku tangkap; Awaslah pun burong jubjub, dan ferumi bandersenap.
![]() |
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
![]() |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|