THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.christnet.demonology,alt.magick.goetia,alt.magick,alt.pagan.magick,alt.religion.angels From: nocTiferSubject: Possession and Spirit-Appearances Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:28:45 GMT 50040316 vii om kali nocTifer: >> when Poke talks about "The Goetia spirits (and demons)" >> is he necessarily referring to the same set of objects or >> subjective components? if I 'tame' them will they become >> tame for *everybody* thereafter? sri catyananda : > What a cool idea! This would make a nice plot for a film -- the > guy who spends his entire life taming demons for the sake of all > humanity. possibly in part the compassionate interest of Chud rites in Vajrayana Buddhism (corrections welcomed -- the monks feed the demons with their own bodies as I understand it). inasmuch as this ties into psychology theories and integration within a Transpersonal perspective, I think an examination of spirits with a more compassionate and tolerant attitude might be best for all species of entity (human and non). > But that aside, you are facing the same issue that appears in > trance possession religions -- the bilocation and inconsistency > of a spiritual entity. In Santeria these inconsistent forms are > called "roads" or "caminos" -- there are dozens of caminos for > each orisha (spirit being). you're positing different forms for the goetic spirits in the same way that the orishas or lwa have different faces or forms. that may make demons into more potent spirits than they are usually supposed. I don't disagree. my impression is that the rudimentary and simplistic understanding of demons in general is indicative of a strained relationship with them. we may then wonder what other relations with them are possible and what the benefits or detriments of such relations might be. > We heard something today on NPR about > the historical evolution of Jesus from a suffering person to a > feminine ideal, thence to a muscular ideal, and so forth. The > same is true of demons and of the gods and spirits of pantheistic > religions. In India there are dozens of manifestations of Kali > and Durga and Ambika and Uma and Parvati. In Europe there are > dozens of manifestations of the Blessed Virgin Mary as white, > black, happy, sad, suffering, maternal, grieving, and so forth. > I assume the same is true for demons. the followup issue, then, is whether the spirits or gods appear as they do for certain people because of who those people are or what they do. there is a convention, for example, that the spirits or gods will not appear if they aren't given the right offerings (foods/smokes/sigils/etc.). some of them will not appear unless the caller is a priest of the religion, it is said, or performs the proper preparation or ritual activities. in the case of demons, often the demons are described in very strict terms as beings who wish to possess human beings (giving religious like Christians incentive to employ their god Jesus as a means of exorcizing or casting them out -- sometimes even without the individual asking to be so 'remedied' -- one might describe this god as antagonistic to other spirits therefore). where did the term "possession" come from? is it a condemnation term originally used to marginalize non-Christian religions as involved with coercive and "evil" spirits? are there exorcist orishas or lwa with similar functions as the Jesus spirit? is the description of angels as requiring INvocation and demons necessitating for safety purposes Evocation also constructed from within this particular cosmological mindset? if so, then Poke's relationship in worshipping the spirits that were identified as gods by some and demons by Christians may be completely understandable. one might thereafter wonder whose task it could be to assist the goetic spirits, whether they are just misunderstood, whether they might be valuably worshipped, if they have forms which are not as horrendous as represented by the grimoire describing them, etc. in fact, the reverse might also be true. spirits understood to be gods might have "demonic appearances". appearance ITSELF may be a function of interface and relative friendliness content. an inverso-Christian Satanist might be described as best evoking the Yahweh demon taking precautions to surround themself with goetic names fearsome to the Yahweh cultists and the Yahweh god, power tools inimical to the spirits of Christianity, etc. this is to some degree what I mean when I describe my God as "Queen of Demons". not only is She, as depicted by Her fervent devotees, a Protectress and Fount of Benefaction, but to those who know Her caustic side or oppose Her, She is the Great Beastie from the Infernal Depths, omnipotent as Time and the Decimator of Those Who Tangle With Her What Are Not Ready. one might speculate that the power of the spirit or god, if not the familiarity with said being, was displayed by the number and variety of such 'caminos' or appearances. > ...Poke, like most pantheists, is comfortable and > non-threatened by the concept of varying caminos > for his spirits. while he doesn't always put it this way, I agree. [massive snippage, RE the True Grimoire:] > ...I agree with you that the 83 demons of the Grimoirium > Verum seem far less rationally organized than the 72 demons > of the Lemegeton. yet both are said to be evil. here's where the "evil" begins to interfere with our relation to the beings in question. "they are said to be evil". who was it that originated the evaluation of these beings? if we are to take them seriously as objective spirits (rather than some subjective energy that one might integrate into oneself), then the attitude and perspective of the evaluator will necessarily colour perceptions and approach to those we're encountering if we take their report at face value without due consideration. in part this is why I keep asking people what their experience is when they attempt to encounter these and other spirits. if we can't observe the interaction and record it, as it takes place subjectively, we can at least 1) observe what the individuals do when they are in touch with the beings in question -- whether they delight in malevolence or beneficence, whether they seem to like destruction or creativity, whether they exhibit certain personality-traits we could composite into a character-portrait of the being as has been done for spirits (including gods, demons, djinns, etc.) for aeons. 2) obtain reports from those who claim to have had an encounter with such beings, particularly those going by the same name and taking note of the differing methods used to encounter them -- does the forced appearance and trapping of them inside symbolic cages predispose them to be ugly and coercively nasty to those who use this method? perhaps the reputation and character of some demons is in part the result of precisely these types of reports. if so, the issue of whether different caminos or appearances of spirits take place becomes immediately important, and the dogmatic repetition of some anonymous report should be considered unhelpful *except* to those of like character or background/belief/allegiance. > Did you notice that 83 minus 72 equals 11? I did not! thanks for pointing this out! and I'm the one that usually pays attention to numbers/math! > That's about all i have to say on this except thanks again for > bringing out some of the OTHER grimoires. my pleasure. there's a handful that have received the attention of Hermetic and ceremonial mages during the course of years. I'm finding it valuable to analyze the character of spirits as described by religious, whether they do or do not originate in the religion in question, and come to understand how they might indeed vary in their appearance to different means of address. my intention is to construct a truly global demonology which is devoid generalizations without basis. y r B o l b n e e w s a o s s d e t e d ! .com@nagasiva nocTifer
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|