THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.pagan.magick,alt.magick,alt.paranormal.spells.hexes.magic,talk.religion.newage,sci.skeptic From: nagasivaSubject: Criteria Demonstrating Magic (was Skepticism ...) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:01:47 GMT 50020619 AA7 can a demonstration of MAGIC take place in which are obtained consistently repeatable RESULTS? what will be the nature of these results? the criteria would depend upon the terms 'magic' and 'results' and their intended meanings. choreographing the demonstration is the first step in defining the terms in question, which is why this challenge was immediately raised in response to a claim resembling the one above in recent discussions in usenet. fictions about the limitations of scientific enterprises in ability to explain a phenomenon are never supported with evidence. the issue pertains to knowledge sets outside the predominantly believed. this is supported in the well-regarded writings of philosophers of science (widely-read in the skeptical community) such as Kuhn. bubbles of knowledge may or may not intersect, but their referents will inevitably overlap, causing social diffraction and alternatives to arise to account for them (e.g. Newtonian and Einsteinian physics). to say "this is scientifically inexplicable" is to maintain that the listener or some other party ('the scientists') would find it difficult or impossible to account for the data under consideration, at its best use. this sort of thing is portrayed in horror stories (e.g. Lovecraftian) all the time, and is one of the reasons why the enthusiasts of ceremonial magic and role-playing intersected (see Black Moon Archives photocopies of Lovecraftian ceremonialism; or the writings of authors like Bertiaux, Grant, and many others; as well as expression of Chaos Magicians and Satanists). if you're talking about "current scientific understanding", then it probably means some academic conglomerate or investigatory institute. there is no reason to presume something extraordinary until presented evidence to support it. social spectrums of knowledge are buffers against scallywags and rogue instructors. they are a kind of mean by which it may be safe to steer (each of us varying as is our wont, from these). without a further elaboration on the understanding you have implied, it is difficult to know your meaning. Jack Dominey : >...if you are claiming to do something "scientifically inexplicable", >then you're pretty much asserting that nobody in the scientific realm >understands why or how the result comes out. literally that they cannot account for it in their models. given science-fiction-based imaginations and those which extend some depth into microscopic and even macroscopic realms, why would the scientific realm somehow be stymied into silence on the matter? this is better seen as a challenge to those who are interested in demonstrations of magic to begin performing them for observation by the interested. one might consider Houdini and his interest in Spiritualism and seances as a comparable circumstance, where skeptics are concerned. its areas of focus (intentional change, repeatedly successful results) are very important to those interested in politics and games of chance, and should be easily funded where convincingly presented. presentations following this post may be archived for future discussion on demonstration criteria desired. > It would be as though you could change the boiling point of pure > water at standard temp. and pressure via a ritual. some believe in this movie-magic, sure, especially as it becomes exaggerated by virtue of ascribed effect and learning curve. n a B g l b a e e s s a i s s v e t a d ! @yronwode.com
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|