THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.christnet.demonology,alt.pagan.magick,alt.magick.goetia,alt.magick From: nocTiferSubject: Physical Manifestation in Goetic Evocation and Mystical Results Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 01:52:25 GMT 50031030 viii om Gnomedplume@unowhere.com (Gnome d Plume): # Asking someone who obviously wants to believe in an irrational, # immature concept of what constitutes an apparition; i.e. a "body" for # a "disembodied spirit" (a contradiction in terms even in medieval # parlayance) to have a "clearer understanding" of DuQuette's # statement--or my Hermetic/Jungian magical field theory, is pointless. given the number of contentions about evocation to visible (physical) manifestation, it is far from irrational; there are whole spiritualist communities that believe such things about other types of entities, including gods and ghosts. as for immaturity, the way that one conducts oneself is far greater an indicator of maturity than WHAT one believes per se. slamming someone for the content of their belief is just a kind of political and doctrinaire repudiation that holds little water, especially when there is a hefty tradition of interprtation which supports it. this smacks of your rivalry with other ceremonialists, and it does you little good to treat them with disrespect. # The Tibetan method for dealing with this foolishness is to take the # kid out to a graveyard at dusk, tie him to a tree and tell him to # evoke every demon he can think of all night long. # In the morning, if he hasn't died of freight, they find him a # wiser and more philosophical student. right, toss the child into the water to make them swim. ask sri catyananda how well that worked for her aquatic navigation skill. maybe that's how they train people in bootcamp, but it isn't generally a very compassionate approach, and it may not have the same results you'd prefer. there is always the possibility that being *forced to do something* is insufficient to enable that thing (i.e. one needs the intention to make it happen), and your intimidation tactics would result in nothing at all. it might even result in someone turning against you. I can say that your bluster in response to my considered questions was not convincing, and in fact gave me reason to conclude that you were insufficiently informed and emotionally immature. # With all your recommended testing procedure, has it occurred to # you that if these Goetic demons were actually as separate from us, and # as physically potent and powerful as the Jasons among us believe, why # haven't they manifested in this horrendous manner in six O.T.A. # Temples in hundreds of operations over 30 years? you did something wrong? that's the usual excuse given for their lack of appearance. given that you've created a novel method of interaction (your mirror-technique), this is certainly an available criticism of your activities. on the other hand, without some kind of testimony to the positive using traditional methods (can we obtain this via Kraig or Savedow or someone? -- it does seem so), it is unreasonable to believe in the efficacy of what is being taught in other quarters. # Are they hiding this physical capability from us? If so, why? you've prevented them from the physical corporation somehow through your chosen methods? why do you conclude to the contrary? # Is it possible that we are the victims of some demonic # conspiracy? maybe you're dialing the wrong number. certitude is to some degree, in the art magical, a measure of imbalance, by my assessment, very comparable in intensity to conspiracy-suppositions. # All 72 spirits got together, back in 1969, and unanimously # decided (or maybe were ordered by a Lower Power) to fool me and # Frater Khedemel, and Soror Kara, and over a hundred Fratres and # Sorores over the next 30 years into thinking that we could see them # and channel them, but not touch and feel them, or photograph them. maybe the grimoire itself is faulty, 'blinded' from those who have not the key to its understanding. if something is only perceivable by the subject, is it anything more than imagination? why give it *more* relevance than role-playing and scary Bloody Mary stories? what are you doing to measure the supposed mystical results? # IMO the real reason why some of these people cling to the notion # that Goetia demons are totally separate beings that can physically # manifest is that they can't accept the rebellious and perverse aspects # of their own psyches. if their psyches have such aspects. do you maintain that all who go about summoning such demons have these? # They have to blame their evil on something outside themselves. uncontrolled nature is inside *and* outside. # They can't look at their own faces in a magick mirror because # they don't like themselves. They can't own their own bad. or maybe they don't think that method is effective toward achieving the end you have contended is only available via that course. I don't follow the logic that just because they think spirits of this type can manifest physically that they therefore are afraid to follow you down your path. illogical, and it strikes me more that it seems a threat to your presumed authority (the same as my questions have for you in the past, and the same that Tom's incessant challenge to you becomes -- your outrageous attempts to intimidate in response are flatly in contradiction to the spiritual maturity that mysticism is supposed to yield to the long-time practitioner). # This is (IMO) magical cowardice. They like to think that a "real" # Goetia operation (which they sometimes pretend they've witnessed) # is more dangerous than Siegfried & Roy's act, or more dangerous than looking into mirrors and doing mysticism. # but the real truth is that they are afraid to face themselves. one reply is that you aren't courageous enough to take traditional methods and apply your will to make them work, thereby enabling you access to the powers and knowledge that these demons have. I'm not saying I know the truth here, but there exists a spectrum of perspective on this matter which your bluster doesn't address, and personal confrontation constitutes, especially when sustained, rather contrary evidence to your position *and* your results. # In 30 years we have never been burned, bitten, kicked or slimed # by demons--but that doesn't mean we haven't been scared, amazed, # disgusted, enthralled and wonderfully instructed. sure, but aren't you also *worshipping* some of these demons? how nasty are they if you can invert them and worship them or if they have in fact been inverted previously and turned into "goetic" demons? isn't the very term 'goetic' just some effective negative implication without much force fomented by Christians or lapsed Christians? # Real, genuine spirit evocation is far more exciting and # rewarding than the fanciful ugga-bugga these deluded people # are hopelessly searching for. if they claim to find it, why denigrate them? why not ask them for additional information, get the whole story, and then contribute what you know? the need to be Right is as much a problem as projecting fantasies upon the real. losing sight of this is in part what Tom is pointing out, and taking the Raja by the Tines, so to speak, just testifies to the weakness of your position in the shadow of his criticism. were it just Tom or the more abrasive of your critics for whom you evinced this umbrage, it would be a non-issue. someone else would ask the questions to which you could respond with patience what constitutes a FAQ regarding The Goetia, and Tom's persistent inquiries could be relegated to a formatted response that would serve all of us at least to know what you think. as it is, the whole comes off as a personal squabble, at best, and at worst an indicator that you haven't thought the matter through. in person you're a very amiable guy, Poke, and I've generally enjoyed our interactions where there has been a parity between us and we've listened carefully to one another's perspective. I hope that you can see my post here not as an attack but as a commentary on your tactics. I think that they are insufficient in defending the perspective you are presenting in your doctrines and, admirably, carrying into your practice. I thought this was true when you reacted to me in this way when I just asked queries and I continue to think this is so as you carry on in responding to others in the same, apparently defensive, manner. peace be with you, nocTifer
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|