THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.divination,alt.tarot,alt.magick From: nagasivaSubject: Tarot's Origins, Mamluk Cards, First Divinations Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 11:49:15 GMT 50040718 viii om cutting to the chase.... Gnome d Plume #> Tarot was probably "invented" by the Turks. I have a book on a #> Turkish deck from Fra. Regulus in Istanbul that pre-dates #> Tarouchi. #> ..."The Mamluk Playing Cards"..... Glaux: #># The Mamluk deck is NOT a tarot deck. (Incidentally, there #># may be more than one Mamluk deck at this point. As far as #># I'm concerned, "the" Mamluk deck is the one found in the #># Topkapi museum in Constantinople and first exhibited in #># 1939.) #> #> In this case "Tarot" (in the modern divinatory sense of the term)--- #> ...is a moot point because the original Italian tarocchi deck--- #> was not used for divination--- and neither was the Mamluk deck #> (see Decker and Dummett 2002:100). tarotica@jktarot.com (jk): # Which one was that? # How do you know that? his citation was something to the effect of: The primal mistake [by Mathers in the construction and in particular the symbolism of his deck with Moina Mathers] was to attempt an occult interpretation of the suit cards at all: in so far as they represent anything, it is not the occult Forces of the Universe, but the heraldic emblems of the court of Mamluk Egypt (1250-1517), the source of the oldest known examples of the suit-symbols. -------------------------------------------------- "A History of the Occult Tarot -- 1870-1970", Decker/Dummett, Duckworth, 2002; p. 100. ================================================== # ...to grant that Tarot "was a game" and to admit that it wasn't # "divinatory" doesn't support your assertion that Tarot was # invented by Turks, does it? absolute problem pinpointed, thank you very much. # Has it ever occurred to you that the similarity you are claiming # is actually much greater between the Mamluk decks and the # earliest extant European playing cards, which were certainly # not Tarot cards? ..... that seems likely to me. # First off, Mamluk cards are the model of European playing card decks, # and entered Europe, through Spain and Italy, in the 14th century. Tarot # wasn't invented until the early-mid 15th century, in Italy. Right there # your theory has a problem. # I'll be more specific: the 22 trumps are what make a deck Tarot. some number, sure. and apparently they make a 'Deck With Trumps'. how did you ascertain that there was only 22 in the earliest decks? when are you identifying their consolidation as 'Tarot'? # The addition of this special suit to the already-existing # standard Italian # deck (which had been derived from the Mamluk cards) served the # purpose of adding trumps into game play. Later the special suit was # dropped in other games using trumps, and one of the small suits # would be named trumps, usually after some bidding process to # win the right to name it. But Tarot has always retained the trumps # suit, both in game play and in occult play. # # So one can certainly have many kinds of early European card decks # influenced directly and wholly by Mamluk decks, but Tarot requires a # special, non-Mamluk, addition to this, and that addition is Italian in # origin. # # Tarot is therefore an Italian invention, not a Turkish one. seems confirmed by the same source Poke quotes. #># See #># L. A. Mayer: _Mamluk Playing Cards_, ed. by R. Ettinghausen and O. #># Kurz, E. J. Brill, Leiden, 1971 neato. thanks for quoting from it too, Jess. # "Judging from their design, these cards are obviously of Mamluk origin, # and we shall probably not go wrong in attributing them to the 15th # century. Their ornamentation has numerous parallels in Cicassian # decoration, especially in illuminated Egyptian manuscripts." # ...what "the book" actually claims is that a deck # of cards, discovered in Turkey, is obviously of Mamluk Egyptian # origin.... #> I preferred to concentrate on the later frankly divinatory Tarots as #> they related to the Golden Dawn's system (see my Secrets of the #> G.D. Cypher MS. 1997:52-54, 127-141). I like to study that more too, Poke. :> nagasiva
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|